Main authors: Matjaž Glavan, Špela Železnikar, Sindre Langaas, Gerard Velthof, Susanne Wuijts, Sandra Boekhold, Susanne Klages, Claudia Heidecke, Marina Pintar
Editor: Jane Brandt
Source document: Glavan M.J. et al. (2019) Evaluation report on barriers and issues in providing integrated scientific support for EU policy. FAIRWAY Project Deliverable 7.1 25 pp


References cited in articles in this section of FAIRWAYiS

  1. Hansen, B.; Thorling, L.; Schullehner, J.; Termansen, M.; Dalgaard, T. Groundwater nitrate response to sustainable nitrogen management. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1-12.
  2. Anglade, J.; Billen, G.; Gamier, J.; Makridis, T.; Puech, T.; Tittel, C. Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed. Agric. Syst. 2015, 139, 82–92.
  3. Quevauviller, P. Is IWRM achievable in practice? Attempts to break disciplinary and sectoral walls through a science-policy interfacing framework in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive. Irrig. Drain. Syst. 2010, 24, 177–189.
  4. EU. Scientific Evidence for Policy Making; European Commission; Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  5. EU. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  6. Quevauviller, P.; Balabanis, P.; Fragakis, C.; Weydert, M.; Oliver, M.; Kaschl, A.; Arnold, G.; Kroll, A.; Galbiati, L.; Zaldivar, J.M.; et al. Science-policy integration needs in support of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8, 203–211.
  7. Weichselgartner, J.; Kasperson, R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20, 266–277.
  8. EUI. EP-EUI Policy Roundtable Evidence and Analysis in EU Policy-Making—Concepts, Practice and Governance; Global Governance Programme (GGP) of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) of the European Parliament, European University Institute: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
  9. De Loe, R.C.; Patterson, J.J. Rethinking water governance: Moving beyond water-centric perspectives in a connected and changing world. Nat. Resour. J. 2017, 57, 75–99.
  10. Quevauviller, P.; Barceló, D.; Beniston, M.; Djordjevic, S.; Harding, R.J.; Iglesias, A.; Ludwig, R.; Navarra, A.; Navarro Ortega, A.; Mark, O.; et al. Integration of research advances in modelling and monitoring in support of WFD river basin management planning in the context of climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 440 (Suppl. C), 167–177.
  11. Ormerod, S.J.; Ray, G.C. Connecting the shifting currents of aquatic science and policy. Aquat. Conserv. 2016, 26, 995–1004.
  12. EC. Agriculture and Sustainable Water Management in the EU (SWD(2017)153/F1)—Commission Staff Working Document; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
  13. Stoate, C.; Báldi, A.; Beja, P.; Boatman, N.D.; Herzon, I.; van Doorn, A.; de Snoo, G.R.; Rakosy, L.; Ramwell, C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 22–46.
  14. Vernier, F.; Leccia-Phelpin, O.; Lescot, J.M.; Minette, S.; Miralles, A.; Barberis, D.; Scordia, C.; Kuentz-Simonet, V.; Tonneau, J.P. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: The case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 6923–6950.
  15. Jacobsen, B.H.; Anker, H.T.; Baaner, L. Implementing the water framework directive in Denmark—Lessons on agricultural measures from a legal and regulatory perspective. Land Use Policy 2017, 67 (Suppl. C), 98–106.
  16. EU. Groundwater as a Resource. Available online: (accessed on 25 October 2018).
  17. Flavio, H.M.; Ferreira, P.; Formigo, N.; Svendsen, J.C. Reconciling agriculture and stream restoration in Europe: A review relating to the EU Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 596 (Suppl. C), 378–395.
  18. WRc. European Level Report: Key Descriptive Statistics on the Consideration of Water Issues in the Rural Development Programmes 2014–2020, UC12064.01; WRc plc, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
  19. EU. The Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive: Actions towards the ‘Good Status’ of EU Water and to Reduce Flood Risks; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
  20. Velthof, G.L.; Lesschen, J.P.; Webb, J.; Pietrzak, S.; Miatkowski, Z.; Pinto, M.; Kros, J.; Oenema, O. The impact of the Nitrates Directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468 (Suppl. C), 1225–1233.
  21. Hérivaux, C.; Orban, P.; Brouyère, S. Is it worth protecting groundwater from diffuse pollution with agri-environmental schemes? A hydro-economic modeling approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128 (Suppl. C), 62–74.
  22. Van Grinsven, H.J.M.; Tiktak, A.; Rougoor, C.W. Evaluation of the Dutch implementation of the Nitrates directive, the water framework directive and the national emission ceilings directive. Njas-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2016, 78 (Suppl. C), 69–84.
  23. Van der Straeten, B.; Buysse, J.; Nolte, S.; Lauwers, L.; Claeys, D.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. The effect of EU derogation strategies on the compliance costs of the nitrate directive. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 421 (Suppl. C), 94–101.
  24. Wall, D.P.; Murphy, P.N.C.; Melland, A.R.; Mechan, S.; Shine, O.; Buckley, C.; Mellander, P.E.; Shortle, G.; Jordan, P. Evaluating nutrient source regulations at different scales in five agricultural catchments. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 24 (Suppl. C), 34–43.
  25. Wall, D.; Jordan, P.; Melland, A.R.; Mellander, P.E.; Buckley, C.; Reaney, S.M.; Shortle, G. Using the nutrient transfer continuum concept to evaluate the European Union Nitrates Directive National Action Programme. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14, 664–674.
  26. Dalgaard, T.; Hansen, B.; Hasler, B.; Hertel, O.; Hutchings, N.J.; Jacobsen, B.H.; Jensen, L.S.; Kronvang, B.; Olesen, J.E.; Schjorring, J.K.; et al. Policies for agricultural nitrogen management-trends, challenges and prospects for improved efficiency in Denmark. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 115002.
  27. Van Grinsven, H.J.M.; ten Berge, H.F.M.; Dalgaard, T.; Fraters, B.; Durand, P.; Hart, A.; Hofman, G.; Jacobsen, B.H.; Lalor, S.T.J.; Lesschen, J.P.; et al. Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 5143–5160.
  28. Buckley, C. Implementation of the EU Nitrates Directive in the Republic of Ireland—A view from the farm. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 78 (Suppl. C), 29–36.
  29. Lundqvist, G.; Gasper, D.; St. Clair, A.L.; Hermansen, E.A.T.; Yearley, S.; Øvstebø Tvedten, I.; Wynne, B. One world or two? Science–policy interactions in the climate field AU. Crit. Policy Stud. 2018, 12, 448–468.
  30. Ritter, C.; Jansen, J.; Roche, S.; Kelton, D.F.; Adams, C.L.; Orsel, K.; Erskine, R.J.; Benedictus, G.; Lam, T.J.G.M.; Barkema, H.W. Invited review: Determinants of farmers’ adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3329–3347.
  31. Liu, T.; Bruins, R.J.F.; Heberling, M.T. Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 432.
  32. Gatto, P.; Mozzato, D.; Defrancesco, E. Analysing the role of factors affecting farmers’ decisions to continue with agri-environmental schemes from a temporal perspective. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 92, 237–244.
  33. Huang, Z.; Karimanzira, T.T.P. Investigating Key Factors Influencing Farming Decisions Based on Soil Testing and Fertilizer Recommendation Facilities (STFRF)—A Case Study on Rural Bangladesh. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4331.
  34. Kuehne, G.; Llewellyn, R.; Pannell, D.J.; Wilkinson, R.; Dolling, P.; Ouzman, J.; Ewing, M. Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: A tool for research, extension and policy. Agric. Syst. 2017, 156, 115–125.
  35. Radin, B.A. Science and Policy Analysis in the U.S. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Adm. Soc. 2018, 50, 161–185.
  36. Head, B.W. Toward More “Evidence-Informed” Policy Making? Public Adm. Rev. 2016, 76, 472–484.
  37. Mitcham, C.; Fisher, E. Ethics and Policy A2—Chadwick, Ruth. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 165–172.
  38. Boswell, C.; Smith, K. Rethinking policy ‘impact’: Four models of research-policy relations. Palgrave Commun. 2017, 3, 44.
  39. Celis, J.E.; Gago, J.M. Shaping science policy in Europe. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 447–457.
  40. EU. Green Paper—The European Research Area: New Perspectives; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
  41. Norse, D.; Tschirley, J.B. Links between science and policy making. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 82, 15–26.
  42. Rich, R.F.; Oh, C.H. Rationality and Use of Information in Policy Decisions. Sci. Commun. 2000, 22, 173–211.
  43. Nightingale, P.; Scott, A. Peer review and the relevance gap: Ten suggestions for policy-makers. Sci. Public Policy 2007, 34, 543–553.
  44. Wildavsky, A. Views: No Risk Is the Highest Risk of All: A leading political scientist postulates that an overcautious attitude toward new technological developments may paralyze scientific endeavor and end up leaving us less safe than we were before. Am. Sci. 1979, 67, 32–37.
  45. Jasanoff, S. STS and Public Policy: Getting Beyond Deconstruction. Sci. Technol. Soc. 1999, 4, 59–72.
  46. Sabatier, P.A. Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. PS Political Sci. Politics 1991, 24, 147–156.
  47. Radaelli, C.M. The role of knowledge in the policy process. J. Eur. Public Policy 1995, 2, 159–183.
  48. Karjalainen, T.; Hoeveler, A.; Draghia-Akli, R. European Union research in support of environment and health: Building scientific evidence base for policy. Environ. Int. 2017, 103 (Suppl. C), 51–60.
  49. Saltelli, A.; Giampietro, M. What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? Futures 2017, 91 (Suppl. C), 62–71.
  50. van Schendelen, R. The in-sourced experts AU. J. Legis. Stud. 2002, 8, 27–39.
  51. CORDIS. Community Research and Development Information Service—Projects and Results. Available online:
    project/acronym%3D%27%27water%27%27 (accessed on 12 October 2017).
  52. WaterJPI. Joint Programming Initiative “Water Challenges for a Changing World”. Avilable online: (accessed on 12 October 2017).
  53. EC. Monitoring and Reporting of Environment Legislation; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. Available online: (accessed on 13 October 2017).
  54. Dunlop, C.A.; Radaelli, C.M. Impact Assessment in the European Union: Lessons from a Research Project. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 2015, 6, 27–34.
  55. Lindblom, C.E. The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Adm. Rev. 1959, 19, 79–88.
  56. Weiss, C.H. Research for Policy’s Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Research. Policy Anal. 1977, 3, 531–545.
  57. Weible, C.M.; Heikkila, T.; deLeon, P.; Sabatier, P.A. Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sci. 2012, 45, 1–21.
  58. Mollinga, P.P.; Bhat, A.; Cleaver, F.; Meinzen-Dick, R.; Molle, F.; Neef, A.; Subramanian, S.; Wester, P. Water, Politics and Development: Framing a Political Sociology of Water Resources Management. Water Altern. 2008, 1, 7–23.
  59. Budds, J. Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum 2009, 40, 418–430.
  60. Prieur, F.; Zou, B. Climate politics: How public persuasion affects the trade-off between environmental and economic performance. Math. Soc. Sci. 2018, 96, 63–72.
  61. Hüesker, F.; Moss, T. The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 38–47.
  62. Daniell, K.A.; Coombes, P.J.; White, I. Politics of innovation in multi-level water governance systems. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 2415–2435.
  63. Biscotti, A.M.; D’Amico, E. What are political leaders’ environmental intentions? The impact of social identification processes and macro-economic conditions. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 129, 152–160.
  64. Martin-Ortega, J. Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 24 (Suppl. C), 83–91.
  65. Mostert, E. The European Water Framework Directive and water management research. Phys. Chem. EarthParts A/B/C 2003, 28, 523–527.
  66. Hodgson, S.M.; Smith, J.W.N. Building a research agenda on water policy: An exploration of the Water Framework Directive as an interdisciplinary problem. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 2007, 32, 187–202.
  67. Lagace, E.; Holmes, J.; McDonnell, R. Science-policy guidelines as a benchmark: Making the European Water Framework Directive. Area 2008, 40, 421–434.
  68. Wemaere, A. Funding research to provide the evidence and the knowledge-base to inform and support policy in Ireland: The EPA Water Research Programme. Boil. Environ. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 2016, 116B, 135–156.
  69. Quevauviller, P. European water policy and research on water-related topics—An overview. J. Hydrol. 2014, 518 Part B, 180–185.
  70. Beniston, M.; Stoffel, M.; Harding, R.; Kernan, M.; Ludwig, R.; Moors, E.; Samuels, P.; Tockner, K. Obstacles to data access for research related to climate and water: Implications for science and EU policy-making. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 17 (Suppl. C), 41–48.
  71. Dunn, G.; Brown, R.R.; Bos, J.J.; Bakker, K. The role of science-policy interface in sustainable urban water transitions: Lessons from Rotterdam. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 73 (Suppl. C), 71–79.
  72. Escribano Francés, G.; Quevauviller, P.; San Martín González, E.; Vargas Amelin, E. Climate change policy and water resources in the EU and Spain. A closer look into the Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 69 (Suppl. C), 1–12.
  73. Doody, D.G.; Foy, R.H.; Barry, C.D. Accounting for the role of uncertainty in declining water quality in an extensively farmed grassland catchment. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 24 (Suppl. C), 15–23.
  74. Brown, L.E.; Mitchell, G.; Holden, J.; Folkard, A.; Wright, N.; Beharry-Borg, N.; Berry, G.; Brierley, B.; Chapman, P.; Clarke, S.J.; et al. Priority water research questions as determined by UK practitioners and policy makers. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 409, 256–266.
  75. Moss, T.; Newig, J. Multilevel Water Governance and Problems of Scale: Setting the Stage for a Broader Debate. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 1–6.
  76. Newig, J.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Sigel, K. The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Eur. Environ. 2005, 15, 333–343.
  77. Reed, M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2417–2431.
  78. Özerol, G.; Newig, J. Evaluating the success of public participation in water resources management: Five key constituents. Water Policy 2008, 10, 639–655.
  79. McGonigle, D.F.; Harris, R.C.; McCamphill, C.; Kirk, S.; Dils, R.; Macdonald, J.; Bailey, S. Towards a more strategic approach to research to support catchment-based policy approaches to mitigate agricultural water pollution: A UK case-study. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 24 (Suppl. C), 4–14.
  80. Martini, F.; Kinga, G.; Christos, F.; Benoît-Fribourg, B.; Amorsi, N.; Stephen, M., 3rd. CIS-SPI Event “Water Science Meets Policy: How to Streamline Knowledge to Address WFD Challenges?” Available online: (accessed on 25 October 2017).
  81. Reyjol, Y.; Argillier, C.; Bonne, W.; Borja, A.; Buijse, A.D.; Cardoso, A.C.; Daufresne, M.; Kernan, M.; Ferreira, M.T.; Poikane, S.; et al. Assessing the ecological status in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: Where do we go now? Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 497 (Suppl. C), 332–344.
  82. Bressers, H.; O’Toole, L.J. Networks and water policy: Conclusions and implications for research AU. Environ. Politics 1994, 3, 197–217.


Note: For full references to papers quoted in this article see

» References

Go To Top